\n Any natural or legal person named or identified in content published on aubeactu.fr or\n aubeactu.com. Being identified does not require being named: a description that lets\n people recognise you is enough. The right is exercised in person, by the legal\n representative of an organisation, or by a successor in title.\n
\n\n The right does not depend on proving an error: having been put in question is enough. It\n is free of charge and not open to negotiation.\n
\n\n\n Through the form below, which constitutes a request as soon as it is recorded and\n triggers a timestamped acknowledgement. By e-mail to droit-de-reponse@aubeactu.fr.\n Or by registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt addressed to the publication\n director, Adnan TOURAK, AubeActu, 5 rue Michelet, 10000 Troyes, France.\n
\n\n Whatever the channel, the three-day period runs from receipt, and your request is entered\n in the same timestamped register. E-mail requests are checked every working day.\n
\n\n\n The identity document is stored outside the site's web root, encrypted, never reachable\n at a public address, and destroyed five years after the file is closed. It is used only\n to verify that you are indeed the person concerned.\n
\n\n\n The reply is limited to the length of the passage that prompted it, up to 200 lines. It\n must relate to the disputed passages.\n
\n\n\n In conditions similar to the disputed content: in the same place, in the same\n typographic presentation, within the body of the article itself and not in a footer or\n on a separate page, reachable for as long as the article, and readable without\n JavaScript. It is headed \"Right of reply\" and remains indexable.\n
\n\n\n The grounds for refusal are exhaustive. A reply may be refused if it is contrary to the\n law, to public order or to public decency, if it infringes the legitimate interest of a\n third party, or if it damages the honour of the journalist. Any refusal is reasoned in\n writing and notified to you.\n
\n\n\n The publication director is not obliged to publish the reply if he or she makes the\n deletion or correction you ask for within three days of receiving your request\n (article 5 of decree no. 2007-1527 of 24 October 2007). In that case\n the correction is published at the foot of the article, dated, and you are informed. If\n the correction does not happen within that period, the reply is published.\n
\n\n\n The right of reply is no longer available, but other routes are: a\n factual correction, with no time limit; a\n removal, anonymisation or de-indexing request, which\n falls under data protection law; a report of unlawful\n content. Court proceedings remain possible within their own time limits.\n
", "corps_texte": "Who may use this right\n\n Any natural or legal person named or identified in content published on aubeactu.fr or\n aubeactu.com. Being identified does not require being named: a description that lets\n people recognise you is enough. The right is exercised in person, by the legal\n representative of an organisation, or by a successor in title.\n\n The right does not depend on proving an error: having been put in question is enough. It\n is free of charge and not open to negotiation.\n\nThe three numbers that matter\n\n 3 months: the deadline to ask, running from the moment the content was made available to the public. After that the request is time-barred.\n\n 3 days: the period within which the publication director must publish the reply, running from receipt of the request.\n\n €3,750: the fine incurred for refusing to publish.\n\nHow to ask\n\n Through the form below, which constitutes a request as soon as it is recorded and\n triggers a timestamped acknowledgement. By e-mail to droit-de-reponse@aubeactu.fr.\n Or by registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt addressed to the publication\n director, Adnan TOURAK, AubeActu, 5 rue Michelet, 10000 Troyes, France.\n\n Whatever the channel, the three-day period runs from receipt, and your request is entered\n in the same timestamped register. E-mail requests are checked every working day.\n\nWhat the request must contain\n\n your full identity and your capacity — person named, legal representative, successor in title;\n\n a postal address, an e-mail address and a telephone number;\n\n the exact address of the content concerned;\n\n a quotation of the passages you dispute;\n\n the text of the reply you are asking us to publish;\n\n a document evidencing your identity.\n\n The identity document is stored outside the site's web root, encrypted, never reachable\n at a public address, and destroyed five years after the file is closed. It is used only\n to verify that you are indeed the person concerned.\n\nLength of the reply\n\n The reply is limited to the length of the passage that prompted it, up to 200 lines. It\n must relate to the disputed passages.\n\nHow the reply is published\n\n In conditions similar to the disputed content: in the same place, in the same\n typographic presentation, within the body of the article itself and not in a footer or\n on a separate page, reachable for as long as the article, and readable without\n JavaScript. It is headed \"Right of reply\" and remains indexable.\n\nWhat may be refused\n\n The grounds for refusal are exhaustive. A reply may be refused if it is contrary to the\n law, to public order or to public decency, if it infringes the legitimate interest of a\n third party, or if it damages the honour of the journalist. Any refusal is reasoned in\n writing and notified to you.\n\nCorrection, the other possible outcome\n\n The publication director is not obliged to publish the reply if he or she makes the\n deletion or correction you ask for within three days of receiving your request\n (article 5 of decree no. 2007-1527 of 24 October 2007). In that case\n the correction is published at the foot of the article, dated, and you are informed. If\n the correction does not happen within that period, the reply is published.\n\nIf the three-month deadline has passed\n\n The right of reply is no longer available, but other routes are: a\n factual correction, with no time limit; a\n removal, anonymisation or de-indexing request, which\n falls under data protection law; a report of unlawful\n content. Court proceedings remain possible within their own time limits." }